German Court Rules Against Ninestar in HP Patent Case
May 29, 2026
A Munich Regional Court has ruled in favour of HP in a patent infringement case involving Ninestar Corporation, recently renamed Pantum Technology, and related European entities including Seine Holland, G&G, Zhuhai Ninestar Information Technology, and Ninestar Image Tech.
According to industry reporting, the court found an infringement of European Patent EP 3 530 470. Importantly, the ruling confirmed the principle of “expanded group liability”, establishing that parent companies can be held directly liable for patent compliance failures across their European subsidiaries.
For ETIRA, this ruling highlights the growing structural and compliance risks facing European distributors when sourcing products through complex international supply chains. The decision also demonstrates that intellectual property enforcement is intensifying within the European Single Market, potentially creating significant financial and operational liabilities for resellers.
Separately, international trade developments, including ongoing U.S. import restrictions affecting Ninestar-related entities under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), reflect a broader global trend toward increased supply chain accountability and due diligence.
ETIRA reminds European distributors and public procurement officers that maintaining supply chains free from patent infringement risks and wider regulatory exposure is increasingly important for protecting brand integrity and fulfilling corporate code of conduct obligations.
The association continues to encourage European businesses and public authorities to prioritise verified and compliant European remanufactured products as part of a responsible and transparent sourcing strategy.
Source: JUVE Patent
Tags
ComplianceIP
2026 AGM Dortmund
May 27, 2026
ETIRA and The Recycler Live Bring the Industry Together in Dortmund
On 21 May 2026, ETIRA held its Annual Meeting during The Recycler Live & Trade Days in Dortmund, Germany, bringing together members and industry representatives from across Europe for discussions on the future of remanufacturing, compliance, sustainability, and circular economy policy.
With strong participation from across the membership, the event once again demonstrated the importance of face-to-face industry engagement at a time of significant regulatory and market change.
During the AGM, members reviewed and approved financial and statutory matters while also discussing ETIRA priorities and ongoing activities for the year ahead. As a member-driven organisation, the meeting provided an important opportunity for participants to contribute directly to the association’s direction and ongoing policy work.

Good conversations
Earlier in the day, ETIRA facilitated a private Industry Round Table bringing together approximately 35 delegates from across the sector. Discussions focused on how evolving remanufacturing business models align with new EU sustainability objectives and the growing recognition of remanufacturing as a strategic pillar of the circular economy.
Participants also examined the increasing impact of non-compliant imports and the continuing distortion of fair competition within the European market. Delegates exchanged views on how the industry can better respond to regulatory, environmental, and enforcement challenges while protecting high-quality European remanufacturing operations.
Additional discussions focused on upcoming EU Ecodesign Regulation measures,

Brussels Brief
broader circular economy policies, empties collection requirements, and the increasing digitalisation of collection and waste systems through DIWASS. Participants agreed that the future of cartridge remanufacturing in Europe remains closely linked to effective collection systems and the continued availability of reusable OEM cartridges.
ETIRA representatives also contributed to the show’s briefing programme through a series of presentations covering compliance developments, sustainability, market trends, and wider industry challenges.
Throughout the event, ETIRA maintained an open booth where members, partners, and visitors could meet, exchange views, and discuss current market developments directly with the association team.
ETIRA members were also strongly represented during The Recycler Annual
Awards presentation held during the evening networking reception. ETIRA members Altkin, Copyclic, Katun, KMP, and Integral were all recognised during the awards ceremony, reflecting the continued strength and innovation of the European remanufacturing sector.
The award for Remanufacturer of the Year was presented to Altkin following an extremely close public vote. Just eight votes behind was CM Printing GmbH, demonstrating the strong support both companies received across the industry.
The evening reception, kindly sponsored by ETIRA member SAPI, provided an excellent opportunity for delegates to continue discussions, strengthen business relationships, and celebrate industry achievements in an informal setting.
ETIRA extends its sincere thanks to the organisers of The Recycler Live & Trade Days, including Editor and Publisher of The Recycler, Stefanie Unland and David Connett of Connett & Unland GbR, as well as all sponsors, speakers, exhibitors, and participants who contributed to the success of the event.
As regulatory and market pressures continue to accelerate across Europe, ETIRA will continue supporting members through advocacy, compliance guidance, industry coordination, and the promotion of sustainable remanufacturing throughout the European market.
Tags
2026Dortmund
ETIRA AGM
EU Customs Update
May 8, 2026
EU Customs Reform Targets Non-Compliant Imports and E-Commerce Loopholes
New rules shift responsibility to platforms and introduce stricter enforcement tools across the EU market
A provisional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council marks a significant step forward in the reform of the Union Customs Code, with a strong focus on addressing the rapid growth of e-commerce imports, product safety, and enforcement efficiency.
The reform responds to a fundamental challenge: the sheer volume of low-value parcels entering the EU from non-EU countries. In 2024 alone, an estimated 5.8 billion such parcels were imported, placing increasing pressure on customs authorities and raising concerns about compliance with EU regulations.
A shift in responsibility
One of the most important changes is the redefinition of responsibility.
Under the new rules, e-commerce platforms and sellers facilitating distance sales into the EU will be treated as importers. This means they will be required to:
- ensure goods comply with EU legislation
- provide full customs data
- pay or guarantee applicable duties and fees
This measure aims to close long-standing loopholes that have allowed non-compliant goods to enter the EU market via complex or opaque supply chains.
New handling fee for individual parcels
A new handling fee will be introduced for goods shipped directly from non-EU countries to EU consumers. The objective is to reflect the real cost of processing the growing number of individual parcels.
The fee will:
- be set by the European Commission
- be reviewed every two years
- apply no later than November 2026
Importantly, the fee will be charged to the responsible economic operator, not directly to consumers.
Incentives for structured supply chains
The reform also encourages the use of EU-based warehouses and bulk imports.
Goods imported in larger consignments and distributed within the EU will benefit from:
- lower handling costs
- more efficient customs processing
This approach supports better traceability and enforcement, while discouraging fragmented, high-volume parcel shipments that are harder to control.
Stronger enforcement and penalties
Companies that repeatedly fail to comply with EU rules will face stricter consequences, including:
- fines ranging from 1% to 6% of annual import value
- loss of trusted trader or AEO status
- classification as high-risk operators
These measures signal a clear shift towards more robust enforcement across the single market.
A new EU Customs Authority
The reform establishes a new EU Customs Authority (EUCA), to be based in Lille, France.
The Authority will:
- coordinate customs cooperation across member states
- oversee risk management
- manage a new EU customs data hub
The data hub will replace over 100 existing IT systems and aims to provide a real-time, integrated overview of goods entering the EU.
ETIRA perspective
For ETIRA, the reform represents an important recognition of the challenges posed by non-compliant imports and fragmented supply chains.
The shift of responsibility to platforms, combined with stronger enforcement tools, has the potential to:
- improve product compliance
- create fairer competition for European businesses
- reduce the flow of non-compliant consumables entering the market
However, effective implementation will be critical. Ensuring that high-risk product categories, including printer consumables, are properly monitored and enforced remains essential.
The agreement now awaits formal approval by the European Parliament and the Council before entering into force.
Tags
ComplianceCustoms
EU
If You Import or Sell Cartridges in the EU
February 11, 2026
This Compliance Checklist Is Your Starting Point
If your company imports, sells, distributes, or places printer cartridges on the EU market, compliance is not optional, and it is no longer something that can be treated as a box-ticking exercise.
EU enforcement is increasing, responsibilities are expanding, and misunderstandings around who is legally responsible remain widespread. The result? Too many businesses are exposed to fines, product seizures, forced withdrawals, and in serious cases, criminal liability, often without realising it.
To help address this, ETIRA has published a practical EU Imported Cartridges Compliance Checklist, designed as a clear starting point for anyone involved in placing cartridges on the EU market.
Why a checklist?
Because most compliance failures do not occur by intent but by assumption.
Common examples ETIRA encounters include:
- Importers assume compliance sits with the overseas supplier,
- Distributors believing obligations stop at logistics,
- Sellers misunderstanding of when CE marking is permitted,
- Companies are underestimating the reach of REACH, CLP, WEEE, and GPSR obligations.
Compliance is not a sliding scale. Like being pregnant, you either are or you are not. There is no such thing as being “a little bit compliant”.
In reality, legal responsibility lies with the company that places the product on the EU market, regardless of where it was manufactured or remanufactured.
What the checklist covers
The checklist sets out ten core compliance areas that apply to new and reused cartridges, including:
- EU presence and accountability,
- Manufacturer and importer identification,
- REACH obligations for chemicals and substances,
- Safety Data Sheets and documentation,
- Declarations of Conformity,
- WEEE registration and take-back obligations,
- Packaging compliance,
- Correct and lawful use of CE marking,
- Intellectual property and first-sale rules,
- The new General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR).
Each point explains what must be done and, crucially, what can happen if it is ignored; from border detention and sales bans to heavy fines and, for REACH breaches, potential imprisonment.
This makes the checklist not just informative, but operational.
Why this matters now
Non-compliant cartridges cannot be reused or remanufactured. They become waste.
Every such cartridge costs the European industry money to dispose of, removes reusable cores from the circular economy, and undermines compliant businesses that invest in doing things properly. At the same time, enforcement authorities are increasingly focused on traceability, documentation, and accountability — especially for imported products.
In short, cost does not reveal compliance. Verification does.
Who should use this checklist?
This checklist is relevant if you are:
- importing cartridges into the EU
- selling cartridges under your own brand,
- distributing products sourced outside the EU,
- operating online marketplaces or fulfilment models,
- remanufacturing or refurbishing cartridges for resale.
If you are involved at any point in placing cartridges on the EU market, this checklist is where you should start.
The EU Imported Cartridges Compliance Checklist is available now via ETIRA.
It is intended as a first step — a practical tool to help companies identify risks, ask the right questions, and avoid costly mistakes before enforcement does it for them.
Further guidance and deeper analysis will follow in upcoming ETIRA publications, but compliance always starts with understanding your obligations.
Tags
ComplianceETIRA
EU
Why you should b(r)other
January 28, 2026
ETIRA was recently asked to assess a toner cartridge offered for sale on the European market as a compatible alternative for a Brother TN-2420 cartridge, intended for use in EU-market Brother printers. The product was marketed as suitable for European models and presented as compliant with applicable EU requirements. At first glance, it appeared unremarkable. A closer inspection, however, revealed serious concerns.

Physical examination showed markings consistent with a non-European cartridge model, partially obscured or altered before sale. In practical terms, a cartridge originally designed for use outside the European market had been re-identified and placed on sale in Europe as an EU-market equivalent. That single discrepancy is sufficient to trigger a cascade of legal and compliance failures.
Under European law, the ability to remanufacture or resell a product depends on the first sale doctrine, also known as the principle of exhaustion. Intellectual property rights are exhausted only when a product has been lawfully placed on the market within the European Economic Area by the rights holder or with their consent. Where that first lawful EU sale never occurred, those rights are not exhausted. The product cannot be legally remanufactured or resold in Europe.
In this case, the original cartridge was not placed on the European market by the OEM. As a result, any remanufacture or resale of that cartridge within the EU infringes the OEM’s intellectual property rights. However, the implications extend beyond IP law alone.
Because the original product was never placed on the EU market, it was never subject to EU conformity assessment. There is therefore no valid EU Declaration of Conformity supporting its sale in Europe. Any CE marking applied to the cartridge, or its packaging, cannot lawfully stand. When such a product is imported and sold in the EU, the importer is effectively declaring compliance for a market the product was never designed or tested for.
Under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, that declaration transfers full responsibility to the importer, who becomes the manufacturer of record. The importer assumes legal liability for conformity, safety, and compliance. Where that declaration is false, market surveillance authorities are empowered to intervene, seize products, order withdrawals, and impose penalties.
While many OEMs actively enforce their intellectual property rights, enforcement across the sector is not uniform. Some rights holders pursue infringements aggressively, while others act selectively or focus their resources elsewhere. In ETIRA’s experience, the full range of enforcement options available to rights holders is not always exercised. This can create the impression in the market that certain practices are tolerated, even where they are not lawful.
That impression is misplaced. The absence of enforcement does not create permission, nor does it limit the legal options available to rights holders or authorities. Compliance obligations exist independently of enforcement patterns, and market surveillance authorities assess legality based on the law, not on past enforcement decisions.
Beyond IP and CE compliance, there is a further consequence that is often overlooked. Cartridges imported in this way frequently cannot be reused by European remanufacturers. They fall outside established reuse streams, are incompatible with local processes, or carry legal uncertainty that makes reuse impractical. In many cases, they are diverted into disposal or OEM recycling schemes that were never designed to absorb this volume.
The result is a perverse outcome. Products imported under the guise of competition increase waste, undermine legitimate remanufacturing, and shift environmental responsibility onto Europe. European businesses and consumers are left paying to manage products that should never have been placed on the market in the first place.
For ETIRA, this case is not about one cartridge or one OEM ecosystem. It is an illustration of how misused compliance markings, re-identification practices, and weak enforcement signals distort the market and damage the circular economy. When one rule is ignored, many others fall with it.
ETIRA will continue to identify such practices, support its members in escalating concerns, and work with OEMs and market surveillance authorities to ensure that European law is applied consistently. Compliance is not a technical detail. It is the foundation of fair competition, environmental responsibility, and trust in the European market.
Tags
CircularityCompliance
Governance
Integrity
ETIRA: Europe Needs Stronger Parcel Levies to Stop Illegal Cartridge Imports
December 16, 2025
The European Union is preparing to introduce in 2026 a new €3 EU-wide handling fee on low-value imports, alongside a growing number of national charges in countries such as Italy and Romania. The measures are intended to curb the huge volume of small parcels entering the bloc, more than 90 per cent of which originate in China and which often bypass essential compliance checks.
ETIRA has welcomed the move as an essential acknowledgement that low-value parcels generate real costs, but warned that €3 alone is far too low to deter non-compliant imports of cheap, single-use cartridges. The association argues that restoring market balance requires a combined approach: a border handling fee, plus proper recovery of WEEE take-back and end-of-life costs currently absorbed by compliant European operators.
To illustrate the scale of that burden, ETIRA uses €8 as a realistic benchmark for the average cost of managing non-compliant cartridges at end of life. While a small inkjet cartridge may cost only a few cents to dispose of, a large 2kg toner cartridge can cost €14 or more. Across the mix of products entering Europe, the average cost borne by the compliant industry sits close to eight euros per cartridge.
A spokesperson for the association said,
“Low-value parcels are entering the EU at unprecedented scale, and a €3 handling fee is a step in the right direction. But €3 does not cover WEEE obligations or take-back costs. Restoring balance requires €3 at the border plus around €8 to cover the real end-of-life burden created by non-compliant cartridges. Without that, illegal and non-compliant imports will continue to shift costs onto compliant European businesses.”
The warning comes as EU companies increase pressure on Brussels to act more swiftly. Some national governments have already taken their own measures. Romania has proposed a fee of 25 lei, and Italy is preparing a parcel tax to shield domestic industries from unfair online competition. Retail groups have cautioned that a patchwork of national charges could undermine the single market.
Momentum for stricter parcel controls is also growing outside the EU. In the United Kingdom, the government announced in its 2025 Budget that it will abolish the existing de minimis exemption for low-value imports, which currently allows goods worth less than £135 to enter the country without customs duty. A formal consultation is now underway, with implementation planned by March 2029. UK industry federations have warned that the loophole is enabling a surge in cheap, non-compliant imports from Asia — concerns that closely mirror those raised by ETIRA in the European market.
ETIRA argues that the solution lies in harmonised EU rules combined with meaningful enforcement. Stronger customs checks, mandatory verification of authorised representatives, and alignment with WEEE and EPR producer registers are essential steps. Without them, the forthcoming Ecodesign framework for imaging equipment will struggle to deliver real environmental improvements.
“Europe is trying to build a circular economy, yet millions of new-build cartridges that do not comply with European standards are still slipping in under low-value thresholds every week,” ETIRA noted. “Recognising the problem with a €3 fee is a start, but only a combined approach that also recovers real WEEE and take-back costs will deliver lasting change,”
ETIRA will continue engaging with EU and national policymakers to ensure that parcel-levy reforms support Europe’s reuse industry and strengthen compliance across the imaging sector.
Tags
ComplianceLevy
WEEE
EU momentum grows for binding reuse targets
December 3, 2025
New RREUSE report reinforces ETIRA’s call for separate reuse targets for printer cartridges
The European policy landscape is shifting in favour of reuse. A major new report from RREUSE, Targets for Reuse and Preparing for Reuse in the European Union, provides strong evidence that Europe needs separate, binding reuse targets across key product streams. This includes WEEE items such as printer cartridges, where the absence of dedicated reuse targets continues to undermine the waste hierarchy.
For ETIRA, the findings confirm what we have long argued. Recycling-only targets disadvantage reuse, create perverse incentives, and prevent the EU from capturing the environmental and social benefits of remanufacturing. With over 100 million toner cartridges collected each year in Europe, the introduction of cartridge-specific reuse and preparing-for-reuse targets is realistic, measurable, and urgently needed.
RREUSE findings validate ETIRA’s longstanding concerns
The RREUSE report makes several key points that directly support ETIRA’s policy position:
- Combined reuse and recycling targets do not work
The report notes that mixed targets incentivise recycling at the expense of reuse. This contradicts the waste hierarchy, which places preparing for reuse above recycling. RREUSE therefore calls for separate targets across all major product streams including WEEE. - WEEE reuse remains neglected
Despite years of discussion, the WEEE Directive still does not include dedicated reuse targets. RREUSE highlights the structural issue: EPR schemes tend to focus on recycling because it is easier and cheaper, leaving reuse operators underfunded and with limited access to the waste stream. For printer cartridges, this problem is acute and long recognised by ETIRA. - Evidence from Member States shows reuse targets are feasible
Flanders, France, the Netherlands, Ireland and others have already introduced reuse targets at regional or national level. Their experience shows that targets improve access to reusable goods, attract investment in reuse infrastructure, and deliver measurable climate benefits. - Reuse delivers major environmental and social gains
The report links reuse to significant reductions in CO₂ emissions and strong job creation potential, especially when implemented by social enterprises. These benefits apply equally to cartridge remanufacturing, which offers both carbon savings and local employment.
A shifting political environment
The publication comes at a moment of wider political momentum. In its 26 November 2025 resolution on unsafe and illegal products circulating on online marketplaces, the European Parliament demanded stronger and faster enforcement, including temporary suspension of non-compliant platforms in cases of repeated or systemic breaches.
This is directly relevant to the printer cartridge market. Non-EU sellers who disregard EU rules distort competition and undermine legitimate reuse operators. ETIRA therefore supports the Parliament’s call for decisive action, including coordinated EU enforcement and stronger obligations for platforms that place products on the market.
What this means for remanufactured printer cartridges
Printer cartridges have long been recognised by the Commission and the Parliament as priority consumables with high reuse value. Yet:
- There is no separate reuse or preparing-for-reuse target for cartridges under WEEE
- EPR schemes focus heavily on recycling rather than reuse
- Non-compliant imports continue to undermine legitimate EU operators
- Reuse data for cartridges is not adequately captured
The RREUSE report strengthens the argument that these gaps must be closed in the forthcoming review of the WEEE Directive.
ETIRA’s position
ETIRA calls on the European Commission to take the following steps within the upcoming legislative cycle:
- Introduce separate reuse and preparing-for-reuse targets for printer cartridges under the revised WEEE Directive.
- Require EPR schemes to finance preparing-for-reuse activities, not only recycling, in line with the waste hierarchy.
- Guarantee access to reusable cartridges for accredited reuse operators across Europe.
- Strengthen monitoring and reporting to ensure that cartridge reuse is measured accurately and consistently.
- Ensure consistent EU-level enforcement against non-compliant imports and platforms offering illegal or dangerous products.
These measures would deliver meaningful environmental gains, support the circular economy, and protect consumers while strengthening the legitimate remanufacturing industry.
Next steps
ETIRA will use the findings from the RREUSE report in its ongoing dialogue with DG Environment, the European Parliament, and national authorities. As the WEEE review progresses, ETIRA will advocate for cartridge-specific reuse targets as a practical and effective way to raise circularity and reduce waste across Europe.
ETIRA Board meets in Italy and visits Ecomondo 2025
November 10, 2025
On 5–6 November, the ETIRA Board of Directors met in Italy for its annual face-to-face meeting. This year, the session was combined with a visit to Ecomondo, the leading European exhibition for the green and circular economy, held annually at the Rimini Expo Centre.
Ecomondo brings together industrial groups, policymakers, stakeholders, opinion leaders, local authorities, research bodies, and institutions to assess strategies for the development of EU environmental policy. ETIRA Board members used the opportunity to engage with reuse organisations and Italian ecolabel bodies during their visit.
While in Rimini, the Board discussed the challenging market conditions faced by ETIRA members. To support its members, the association reaffirmed its commitment to fighting non-compliant new-build cartridges and will intensify outreach to authorities to help stop illegal imports at EU borders. ETIRA will also continue to inform customers about the risks of trading non-compliant, non-OEM products.
The Board also reviewed ETIRA’s 2026 PR strategy and trade show participation, and looked forward to the forthcoming publication of the Impact Assessment for the EU’s proposed Ecodesign Regulation for imaging equipment and cartridges. Under this future regulation, OEMs will be required to share firmware and software data with recognised repairers and remanufacturers for a reasonable fee — a key step forward for fair competition and sustainability.
ETIRA comments on EU plans for Circular Economy Act
The European Union is preparing a Circular Economy Act to enhance Europe’s economic security and competitiveness, while promoting more sustainable production, circular business models, and decarbonisation. The Act aims to facilitate the free movement of circular products, secondary raw materials, and waste. It will also increase the supply of high-quality recycled materials and stimulate demand for these materials across the EU.
Before drafting the law, the European Commission is calling for input from stakeholders. ETIRA has therefore urged the EU to provide urgent regulatory support for the reuse of cartridges as cartridges.
Our industry is under existential pressure, not only due to anti-reuse practices by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), but also because of the surge of cheap, polluting, non-OEM single-use cartridges (SUCs) flooding into Europe from Southeast Asia.
ETIRA calls for immediate EU action to remove OEM barriers to cartridge reuse, including restrictions on access to empties. Third-party remanufacturers must have full and unrestricted access to OEM software, and printer firmware updates must not block the use of remanufactured cartridges. Furthermore, non-reusable, cheap, polluting SUCs should be banned from the EU market.
Public bodies should lead by example in promoting the reuse of cartridges. ETIRA therefore calls for the EU’s Green Public Procurement (GPP) criteria to be made mandatory.
The EU WEEE Directive should also be revised to include a dedicated target for the reuse of cartridges.
Finally, in EU waste law, used cartridges should be classified as raw materials, not waste. Current waste transport rules at the EU, national, and regional levels create unnecessary barriers to the remanufacturing of cartridges. ETIRA urges that excessive licensing be reduced and that rules be harmonised across the EU at a low-risk level.